Abstract
Through analysis of the use of topoi and different angles in argumentation, we arrived at an overview of three Danish climate proposals – from the current government, Socialdemokratiet and Enhedslisten. We applied and compared this to a focus-group of Danish voters, in which we found similarities and diversions in argumentation.
Most notably, we found it fairly clear that there is several communication-problems between the voters and politicians, heavily found in divisions of topoi and mistrust from the voters.
